Tuesday, October 28, 2014

3 Things Every GC Should Know About Reducing Larger-Scale Litigation Fees 







SAVE A FORTUNE ON LITIGATION FEES!








1.  At least 25% of your litigation fees are due to inefficiencies!

The more people there are working on your litigation, the more inherent inefficiencies there are. 

Law firms are focused on the end result of the service they provide you.  As you well know, often times they are not even aware of how many people were involved, how many hours it took, or the process of how the work was done.  They are concerned with the quality of their work product and do not necessarily associate a cost with the work product.  It is a different way to run a business for sure, but they do provide a service you need.   

Even though it seems self-serving that law firms do not operate more efficiently, they do not know how or they would be more profitable on alternative fee cases (“AFAs”).   They think they are being efficient, but they don’t know what they don’t know.  As long as billable hours are the core of their business structure and they continue to use billable hours as criteria for advancement and bonuses, they will not have the proper incentive to change.  It is ingrained in their core and a part of their culture, so it stands to reason that it will likely be a while before there is a paradigm shift.

What can you do about it?

2.  Designate someone to focus on increasing efficiencies to reduce fees and costs on your cases

Implementing more efficient procedures, practices and creative solutions for the most consuming time drains will save you more in fees than anything else you can do.  The results are measurable and significant savings are realized in a matter of weeks.

Law firms might have practice group managers, project managers, pricing analyst, case managers, etc., but they do not have someone dedicated to improving efficiencies and reducing your fees.

My experience has been that in-house counsel are able to remedy some inefficiencies but given the magnitude of their responsibilities they do not have the capacity to work hands-on with the firms and vendors on a granular level.  

Improving efficiencies is a way for you to reduce tens of millions of dollars a year per litigation.  It deserves a dedicated person skilled in litigation and law firm operations in order to maximize your results. 

When law firms did not comply with client demands to reduce e-discovery costs, corporations had to step in and either do it in-house or outsource the work.  Increasing operational efficiencies within your own litigation is the next big cost control frontier because there is so much at stake.

3.  Multi-layer your approach to reducing fees

You know more than anyone how large of a problem litigation fees are.  The best solution might be to have a multi-layered approach from several different angles.   Consider incentivizing your in-house teams to keep an open mind and continue implementing additional cost saving measures that would provide the most value.  

Many of you are already handling e-discovery in-house or are using e-discovery vendors.  Other cost saving measures being used are Legal Process Outsourcing, legal department advisors, initiatives, continually discounting rates, budgets, AFAs, legal spend and matter management software, limiting the number of law firms, utilizing “virtual” law firms and litigation efficiency/operations experts.  The methods that save the most, cost the least and are the least time consuming for your team to implement, use and maintain need to be identified and managed.  When is enough enough?  When your litigation fees and expenses are at an acceptable level.

Summary
  • Designate someone to specifically increase law firm efficiencies to: 
    • reduce fees and costs significantly without sacrificing the quality of the litigation
    • provide you with the highest value for your litigation fees
    • enable your law firms to work more efficiently, getting cases better prepared, increasing the likelihood of better outcomes.
  • Multi-layer approaches are most effective.  Incentivize your team to implement additional cost saving measures.
  • Methods that save the most, cost the least and would be the least time consuming to implement, use and maintain need to be identified and managed.

No comments:

Post a Comment